[yaaa11]

do i get to see what each choice has to offer? like, will earth be exploded in 2000 years or completely apocalyptic? will it be dust and ash? and if it's 2000 years *ago*, can i go anywhere? or just a random place?

if yes, and the world is in good shape in 2000 years, definitely choosing the future. right now i'm alive at a time where i get to experience quality of life, and not die from the bubonic plague, but just early enough to where i can't experience the insane technological advances humanity will (hopefully) come up with. i'll definitely be long gone.  

and hey, i can open a history book and there'll be a 800-page summed up version of what happened 2000 years ago, and anything i can't find i can just google. i also definitely do not want to (theoretically) alter anything historically. 

so yes, depending on a few factors, definitely future. 100%

[wwfww]

the technological wonders that may be discovered, and the opportunity to see the people of the future. Others say they would rather live in the past because they don't think humans will be around in 1,000 years

[captainmehedi]

it depends how rich are you at each set time lol

[Yohann]

2000 years in the future because maybe we will become immortal

[En3ronthegreat]

Future of course, better medicine , better life conditions , how is that even a question lmao

[skoas]

pretty sure theres nothing to do 2K years ago

[DredgenSun]

200 years ago man, seeing mankind with fuck all showed their creativity, very inspiring!

[bigbozo]

Would you rather be rich or poor ahh dilemma

[Liskapouf]

2000 years in the future for sure, just imagine how many cool stuff we will have by then

[flyingdex]

2000 years in the future could also be a shithole like the word has never seen, at least you know what you're getting with the past