[FatihTerim]

@FatihTerim

According to this screenshot shared by you , there wasnt any key. As long as the buyer receives the goods after payment, we are okay.

@danol

Confirm if the API works

There’s a key, look at the link. Above the thanks message that’s the API.

If you look closely, the ending of that API says "PUTTHEIDHERE" instead of the key.

No, it doesn’t work like that, the ID is the IntelX ID. you search a domain on intelx which you wanna get data on, the id you copie and put in the link thats how it works XD.

The api works the id is optional which the user of the api needs to fill it in

[WillyWonka]

Understood. You can work it out with the user(since you have the goods), I dont have any issues. I have PMd the user and removed that API endpoint from the report.

[FatihTerim]

Understood. You can work it out with the user(since you have the goods), I dont have any issues. I have PMd the user and removed that API endpoint from the report.

I can’t work anything out, the user made a false report. He got the api but deleted the messages and now he is saying I scammed him to get me banned or that I need to refund him or something.

idk why he made this false report about me?

[WillyWonka]

@FatihTerim

Considering that the ID has to be entered by the user on the API endpoint, there are no discrepancies with your screenshots. However, it still is locally editable and since you took a few hours to send it to us(even though you were ready for business), it raises red flags.

On the other hand, @danol has a history of buying on the forum, so its odd that they would do something like that.

In this case, due to the grey area, you need to make sure the buyer confirms that the goods are working, since you have received the funds.

[FatihTerim]

@FatihTerim

Considering that the ID has to be entered by the user on the API endpoint, there are no discrepancies with your screenshots. However, it still is locally editable and since you took a few hours to send it to us(even though you were ready for business), it raises red flags.

On the other hand, @danol has a history of buying on the forum, so its odd that they would do something like that.

In this case, due to the grey area,  you need to make sure the buyer confirms that the goods are working, since you have received the funds.

I never was ready for business, I only gave price quotes which doesn’t require any real time except for sending a few messages.

It’s odd that I would scam since I’ve sold to other breachforum members a subscription on my site as well as my bot. And please, if you don’t know how a API works then let another moderator work on this thread because the thingd you’re saying about it don’t make any sense and I’m not saying this to be mean.

The only reason u would wanna believe him is because he has a rank on this forum which is only 50 dollars. And why would he make a report for something that has happened 2 weeks ago like it doesn’t make any sense..

[WillyWonka]

Which part of my message made you think that I don't understand how an API works?

I've literally said "Considering that the ID has to be entered by the user on the API endpoint, there are no discrepancies with your screenshots." and then the next statement was about the html export. That means - I believe that your API works, I even tested that.

But the issue at hand has nothing to do with my understanding of APIs.

You have the money, you deliver the goods. If you had the hard evidence as screenshots and did not take the time to send the "export", I would have banned the OP without question.

Since you dont have all that, you're gonna have to work with my suggested approach.

@IntelBroker feel free to chip in

[FatihTerim]

Which part of my message made you think that I don't understand how an API works?

I've literally said "Considering that the ID has to be entered by the user on the API endpoint, there are no discrepancies with your screenshots." and then the next statement was about the html export. That means - I believe that your API works, I even tested that.

But the issue at hand has nothing to do with my understanding of APIs.

You have the money, you deliver the goods. If you had the hard evidence as screenshots and did not take the time to send the "export", I would have banned the OP without question.

Since you dont have all that, you're gonna have to work with my suggested approach.

@IntelBroker feel free to chip in

I don't think you understand me. I export the chats because it's much easier than taking screenshots of long conversations with my customers that happen every hour. Exporting helps me with this. I think it is a shame that a complaint is being made against me even though he received all the products after payment. He is currently just trying to scam me while I stand behind my product and am fair.

[danol]

These are all fake chat records. Please believe me.
He edited this damn liar.

---

And the service I bought is not intelx. I bought the service of query ssn. It's so funny.

---

https://ibb.co/ZdY75Z4
Please add the hidden chat record section to prove that what you posted is real.

[WillyWonka]

@FatihTerim respond.



According to @danol's screenshot, there are 2 messages from both users before the "hi"

However, @FatihTerim already shared the following screenshot: https://ibb.co/1755xcj ; and there's a single message from each user before the "hi" @ 1:36.

@FatihTerim used the same timezone as you in the edited pictures, but funnily enough his usual time to come online is pretty different.

[danol]

He must not have thought that I have other pictures. I have enough evidence to prove that he is making up chat records.